Y’know, it’s funny. There was no such front page in 2007 when Brown became PM without a vote (no GE til 2010) or in 2014 when @NicolaSturgeon became FM without a vote (no Scottish elex til 2016)
It’s **almost** as if their pearl clutching sanctimony is actually partisanship… pic.twitter.com/K3ygCqghcm
— Ruth Davidson (@RuthDavidsonPC) October 25, 2022
Does the Colonel have a fair point here? Spoiler: no of course she bloody doesn’t, but let’s at least start by giving her credit for a couple of specific aspects of her tweet. Firstly, it’s obviously true that the Record is a repulsive “newspaper”, the existence of which represents an ongoing crime against humanity, and it would do all of us a tremendous service if it voluntarily winded up operations immediately. (Although the idea that it’s “partisan” in favour of the SNP as well as Labour is downright risible.) And secondly, I think most independence supporters would agree in retrospect that it was sub-optimal that Nicola Sturgeon did not face a contested leadership election in 2014. Although her victory would have been assured anyway, it would have been highly desirable for her to have been required to engage in an internal SNP debate about the way forward in the immediate aftermath of the indyref defeat, and also about the medium-term strategy for independence in the event that Brexit reopened the issue. To some extent the depute leadership election served as a proxy for that debate, and you might remember that I backed the eventual winner Stewart Hosie, because his strategic vision seemed clearest and strongest to me, but ultimately we knew we were electing someone who wouldn’t be calling the shots.