• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

Fact Check: Sixty per cent of Scots farmers did not vote No, for Brexit and for Tories

July 26, 2018

Burnham’s expected reverse ferret

September 10, 2026

The independence cat is out of the bag

September 10, 2026

Burnham’s crack in the constitutional dam

September 9, 2026

BBC Scotland’s educational F grade

September 8, 2026

The smokiest of smoking guns

September 4, 2026

The BBC’s clutching pearls are in aisle three

September 3, 2026

The branch office’s stagnant talent puddle

September 2, 2026

Keir today, gone tomorrow

September 1, 2026

The Record’s proposed trigger for Indyref2 benefits Labour not Scotland

August 31, 2026

Pros and cons of a defacto indyref, and the SNP conference

August 30, 2026

Meet the new boss, you know the rest

August 27, 2026

Wind turbines and threats to national security

August 25, 2026
  • Home
Monday, September 14, 2026
  • Login
Aye We Can
No Result
View All Result
Aye We Can
No Result
View All Result
Home Comment

Fact Check: Sixty per cent of Scots farmers did not vote No, for Brexit and for Tories

by
July 26, 2018
in Comment
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Scotland’s farmers are facing an uncertain future as the Brexit negotiations falter, with the National Farmers Union leader calling a ‘no deal’ EU exit an “armageddon scenario” for the industry.

Ferret Fact Service was asked to check a widely shared text image on social media in recent weeks which made four claims about farmers in Scotland.


Ferret Fact Service | Scotlands impartial fact check project

The image appeared on to the page ‘Yes to an Independent Scotland‘ and has received more than 1,300 shares. It claims those in the farming industry voted against Scottish independence, for the Conservatives, and for Brexit.

Scottish farmers – 60% voted No to Scottish Independence, 60% voted for Brexit, 60% voted Tory, 60% estimated to be declared bankrupt within a decade of Hard Brexit.
Social media graphic

Ferret Fact Service looked at this graphic, and found its claims to be Mostly False.

Evidence

The relationship between farming in the UK and the European Union has long been a complicated one. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), an EU policy to help support and subsiding farming in its member states, means that a proportion of the EU budget goes on paying farmers to mitigate falling food prices and volatility in the agriculture market.

In the early days of the common market CAP accounted for 80 per cent of its budget. After criticism for supporting overproduction, the policy was reformed and now accounts for a smaller proportion of spending.

In the UK, the policy has been controversial among farmers because the UK has received less in payments than it contributes, leading to complaints that British farmers are subsidising those in other EU nations.

A recent House of Commons report stated that CAP subsidies can “make up anywhere from 50-80% of a UK farmer’s income”.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) estimated that CAP payments represented an average of 55 per cent of farm incomes in 2014.

The claims in this graphic are based around polling done of the farming community about their views on Scottish independence, Brexit and their voting intentions in the general election.

The claims come in chronological order, with the claim that 60 per cent of Scottish farmers voted No in the 2014 Scottish independence vote.

No official breakdown is available for how different professions vote in elections and referenda, so the best evidence of the claims is in pre- and post-election polls done by organisations including the National Farmers Research Unit.

A survey in June 2014, before the September vote, showed that 71.8 per cent of farmers in Scotland wanted to remain part of the UK, while just 10 per cent supported a Yes vote. Farmers in other parts of the Britain were also polled despite not being eligible to vote, and the overall UK average was 65.1 per cent for No, with 8.6 per cent for Yes and a significantly portion (26.3 per cent) undecided.

Ferret Fact Service could not find any polls of farmers taken in the immediate aftermath of the vote, so it not possible to give a more up to date figure, but it appears that the suggestion that 60 per cent voted No is not based on any evidence.

The second claim is 60 per cent of farmers voted to leave the European Union in 2016. This appears to have come from another survey done before the vote by the trade magazine Farmers Weekly.

This poll was taken over a month before the referendum, and found 58 per cent of farmers in the UK were backing Brexit, with 30 per cent wanting to remain. However, this was a UK-wide poll, with Scotland highlighted as one of the least inclined areas to back Brexit.

Polling done by the same newspaper after the vote found that support had fallen, with 53 per cent of respondents said they had voted Leave.

On this count then, the graphic appears to have misattributed the wider pre-referendum poll to just Scottish farmers.

Now, moving on to another 60 per cent claim, this time farmers in Scotland voting for the Conservative party.

National Farmers Research Unit polled farmers across the UK to gauge their views ahead of the 2017 general election.

The organisation asked 1,064 UK farmers: “With the upcoming general election in mind, in your opinion which political party values the interests of UK agriculture the most?”

In Scotland, the most common answer was “None” (35 per cent), followed by the Scottish Conservatives on 28 per cent and the SNP on just 7 per cent.

Another survey by Farmers Weekly suggested 71 per cent of UK farmers intended to back the Conservatives, but no regional breakdown for Scotland was given.

So again, the statistics in the claim appear to be without foundation.

The impact of Brexit on farming in the UK has been widely discussed since the vote, with the potential of a ‘no deal’ scenario on the horizon.

A report from Informa Agribusiness Intelligence in 2017 suggested that 90 per cent of UK farms would collapse without a deal in place. However, leading Brexit figures have since suggested that subsidies would continue in some form.

Any estimates on the number of businesses that will be forced out of existence by a ‘no deal Brexit’ are extremely likely to be incorrect, as there are currently no reliable ways to model economic impact further than the immediate future because of the large number of variables and volatility of the economy after a serious political change.

Ferret Fact Service verdict: Mostly False

The four claims in this graphic appear to be based on inaccurate and misleading assessments of polling by farming specialist publications and organisations. There are no official reports of how different sectors vote, and these claims rely on self-selecting surveys not done by reputable polling companies.

This claim is Mostly False

Ferret Fact Service (FFS) is a non-partisan fact checker, working to the International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers’ code of principles. All the sources used in our checks are publicly available and the FFS fact-checking methodology can be viewed here. Want to suggest a fact check? Email us at factcheck@theferret.scot or join our community forum.

More like this

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

ShareTweet

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Burnham’s expected reverse ferret
  • The independence cat is out of the bag
  • Burnham’s crack in the constitutional dam
  • BBC Scotland’s educational F grade
  • The smokiest of smoking guns

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • September 2026
    • August 2026
    • July 2026
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018

    Categories

    • Comment
    • CommonSpace
    • Craig Murray
    • Lesley Riddoch
    • Phantom Power
    • The National
    • Uncategorized
    • Wee Ginger Dug
    • Yes Bikers

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Aye We Can

    Copyright © 2017 JNews.

    Navigate Site

    • About
    • Home
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Members
    • Password Reset
    • User

    Follow Us

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    No Result
    View All Result
    • About
    • Home
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Members
    • Password Reset
    • User

    Copyright © 2017 JNews.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
    Loading Comments...