• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

‘Land Grab’: Campaigners say Scottish Enterprise have no right to sell public Loch Lomond land to developers

June 24, 2018

Burnham’s expected reverse ferret

September 10, 2026

The independence cat is out of the bag

September 10, 2026

Burnham’s crack in the constitutional dam

September 9, 2026

BBC Scotland’s educational F grade

September 8, 2026

The smokiest of smoking guns

September 4, 2026

The BBC’s clutching pearls are in aisle three

September 3, 2026

The branch office’s stagnant talent puddle

September 2, 2026

Keir today, gone tomorrow

September 1, 2026

The Record’s proposed trigger for Indyref2 benefits Labour not Scotland

August 31, 2026

Pros and cons of a defacto indyref, and the SNP conference

August 30, 2026

Meet the new boss, you know the rest

August 27, 2026

Wind turbines and threats to national security

August 25, 2026
  • Home
Monday, September 14, 2026
  • Login
Aye We Can
No Result
View All Result
Aye We Can
No Result
View All Result
Home CommonSpace

‘Land Grab’: Campaigners say Scottish Enterprise have no right to sell public Loch Lomond land to developers

by qwertyfan
June 24, 2018
in CommonSpace
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Local council leader: “My previous position was in favour of the principle being established but then looking at the detail at the later stage it no longer made sense.”

CAMPAIGNERS have branded the proposed development of a new tourist resort at Loch Lomond a “land grab”, after a packed out local meeting about the Scottish Enterprise plan changed the local council leader’s mind. 

Scottish Enterprise has appointed Flamingo Land Limited as the preferred developer for its 20-hectare site at West Riverside, Balloch, in Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park, and the company – famous for its theme parks – recently purchased the adjacent 12 acre Woodbank site for future development.

A petition against the development has attracted 35,000 signatures, and Alannah Maurer from the Save Loch Lomond local campaign group described the development as a “land grab”.

“Scottish Enterprise should not have the right to sell public land,” she said. 

READ MORE: Loch Lomond’s wild camping ban ‘threatens to roll back land reform’

Maurer added: “This area is a national park therefore it is for the nation to decide what best fits their park, yet there has been no national information campaign undertaken by any of the bodies concerned to inform the public of this proposed development.

“The land sits within the boundary of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs national park and is a renowned world beauty spot, an area of peace and tranquillity which has been enjoyed by locals and tourists for free.

“We wish to retain the land, the shore and water access, the woods and our rights to this land for both locals and visitors for future generations to come.

“Flamingo Land is not the best fit for a development within a national park and will do nothing to enhance the visitor experience at Loch Lomond.”

Loch Lomond and The Trossachs is one of Scotland’s top tourist destinations and in the past five years alone attracted 1.5 million visitors, containing 21 Munros, 57 nature conservation sites and two forest parks.

Flamingo Land Limited’s proposal would include lodges, a boutique hotel, hostel and glamping pods together with a range of family-based attractions and restaurants.

“We wish to retain the land, the shore and water access, the woods and our rights to this land for both locals and visitors for future generations to come.” Alannah, Save Loch Lomond

A report from the Daily Record in 2016 claimed that there could be a theme park within the development, but Scottish Enterprise denied this when contacted by CommonSpace, and said: “The development at West Riverside holds huge economic potential not only through job creation but also in securing Balloch as a key tourism destination.  It is important to note there are no plans for a theme park and any proposed development would be in keeping with the National Park and its natural beauty.”

The Scottish Enterprise spokesperson said they were sympathetic to public fears and are encouraging dialogue.

“As part of this process, we would encourage everyone to have a look at the plans online and feedback any comments.  Community engagement and consultation remains a key part of the master planning process,” the spokesperson said.

The Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park Authority (LLTNAP) have also said they are keen to hear the views of the public and say that these views will be considered throughout the decision-making process, which is still ongoing.

LLTNAP said: “We would encourage anyone who would like to comment on the proposal to contact us directly, so their views can be taken into consideration during the decision-making process.

“Members of the public can comment on the application either through our e-planning portal, or by emailing or sending a letter to our headquarters before 27th June which is the statutory deadline. However, the consultation period will remain open, and public comments can continue to be submitted until Officers make a recommendation on the proposal.”

“The public meeting was filled with around 200 passionate local people, all of whom have very real concerns with the plans.” Jonathan McColl, local council leader

Jonathan McColl, SNP Leader of West Dunbartonshire Council, is one person who will be challenging the development after attending a public meeting arranged by Balloch and Haldane Community Council last night [19 June]. 167 locals went along to the meeting, including campaigners from Save Loch Lomond. 

McColl said: “The public meeting was filled with around 200 passionate local people, all of whom have very real concerns with the plans. Those who spoke did so in a clear and constructive way and convinced me that there are issues here that will not be resolved at detailed planning stage.”

Listening to the locals led to McColl changing his mind having previously been in favour of the project.

“My previous position was in favour of the principle being established but then looking at the detail at the later stage it no longer made sense. I want to thank everyone who took time to come along and express their views. It is now my intention to submit an objection to the application through the National Park Planning website,” he said.

Readers who want to keep abreast with the campaign groups plans can find them here.

If you would like to respond to LLTNAP’s consultation click here.

Picture courtesy of Argyll Holidays

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

ShareTweet
qwertyfan

qwertyfan

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Burnham’s expected reverse ferret
  • The independence cat is out of the bag
  • Burnham’s crack in the constitutional dam
  • BBC Scotland’s educational F grade
  • The smokiest of smoking guns

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • September 2026
    • August 2026
    • July 2026
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018

    Categories

    • Comment
    • CommonSpace
    • Craig Murray
    • Lesley Riddoch
    • Phantom Power
    • The National
    • Uncategorized
    • Wee Ginger Dug
    • Yes Bikers

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Aye We Can

    Copyright © 2017 JNews.

    Navigate Site

    • About
    • Home
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Members
    • Password Reset
    • User

    Follow Us

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    No Result
    View All Result
    • About
    • Home
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Members
    • Password Reset
    • User

    Copyright © 2017 JNews.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.