• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

Why has McDougall served up a NoN-sense poll? Probably because Labour fear Kate Forbes becoming SNP leader

August 30, 2023

Labour’s lying reply to Believe in Scotland’s petition

September 16, 2026

The positive case for the Union will be along shortly, this time they mean it.

September 15, 2026

The Cardiff Agreement marks a new chapter in the path to independence

September 14, 2026

Burnham’s expected reverse ferret

September 10, 2026

The independence cat is out of the bag

September 10, 2026

Burnham’s crack in the constitutional dam

September 9, 2026

BBC Scotland’s educational F grade

September 8, 2026

The smokiest of smoking guns

September 4, 2026

The BBC’s clutching pearls are in aisle three

September 3, 2026

The branch office’s stagnant talent puddle

September 2, 2026

Keir today, gone tomorrow

September 1, 2026

The Record’s proposed trigger for Indyref2 benefits Labour not Scotland

August 31, 2026
  • Home
Friday, September 18, 2026
  • Login
Aye We Can
No Result
View All Result
Aye We Can
No Result
View All Result
Home Comment

Why has McDougall served up a NoN-sense poll? Probably because Labour fear Kate Forbes becoming SNP leader

by qwertyfan
August 30, 2023
in Comment
0
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A few days ago, Blair McDougall (mastermind of the original and self-styled “Project Fear” in 2014, for younger readers who don’t know who he is) announced that he was commissioning a poll to find out whether replacing Humza Yousaf with Kate Forbes would improve the SNP’s electoral fortunes.  My immediate reaction was that Labour must have identified a Forbes leadership as the biggest threat to their chances in Scotland at the general election, and want to head that danger off by keeping Yousaf in harness at all costs.  McDougall’s poll would therefore be callibrated to produce results intended to misleadingly give the SNP pause for thought about the electoral appeal of Forbes.  Let’s face it, McDougall is a Machiavellian political actor – he’s often pretty rubbish at it, most notably when he talked East Renfrewshire up as a two horse race between himself and the SNP and ended up finishing third, but nevertheless that’s the scheming level on which his mind always operates.  If he goes to all the trouble and expense of commissioning a poll, it’s hardly likely to be ‘curiosity driven’.  It’ll have a very specific practical purpose in the service of the Labour party.

Predictably, then, McDougall has come up with a poll that purports to show Forbes as leader would not increase the SNP’s vote.  It may look like the question he asked was neutral enough, ie. whether people would be more likely or less likely to vote SNP if Forbes becomes leader, but the problem is that there are now enough people out there who hate the SNP that if you ask whether pretty much any hypothetical scenario would make them more likely or less likely to vote SNP, you’ll get a negative response because a significant minority of respondents will want to use every question to bash the party if at all possible. Pretty much the only exception to that would be if the hypothetical scenario is every voter getting a free supply of beer for life.
McDougall knew that perfectly well from previous polls, of course, which is why he framed the question in the way that he did.  Don’t fall for this ruse – if he really thought a Forbes leadership would work in Labour’s favour, he’d be talking her up for all that he’s worth, not talking her down.  There are various ways in which public opinion could have been more meaningfully tested, for example by asking people whether a Yousaf leadership or a Forbes leadership would make them more likely to vote SNP.  That way the question would have become genuinely about the individuals and not a proxy for SNP-bashing, and it probably would have come out firmly in Forbes’ favour, bearing in mind how consistently she outpolls Yousaf on net approval ratings.
If money was no object (which certainly isn’t the case) and I was able to commission another Scot Goes Pop poll in the near future, I’d try to explore this issue in some depth.  However, I don’t actually think McDougall’s stunt will reduce Forbes’ chances of becoming leader, even if there are no alternative polls to challenge the narrative he’s trying to weave.  If Yousaf is toppled before the general election, it’ll be for negative reasons about his own leadership rather than positive reasons about his likely successor.  Some sort of major shock to the SNP’s system would probably have to trigger it.  Remember that the 2004 European election result was enough to bring John Swinney down as leader even though, unlike now, there was absolutely no expectation that a more popular leader would step into the breach.  (We all wrongly assumed that a return for Alex Salmond wasn’t a realistic option.)

*  *  *

My blogpost last Thursday, about the difficulty of keeping Scot Goes Pop going for much longer due to lack of funds, produced a substantial response.  Not all of it is visible on the fundraiser page itself because around half the donations were made directly via Paypal, but over £700 has been raised since I posted.  The fundraiser remains well short of its target, but I’ll certainly keep going for as long as I possibly can, and there’s still some sort of chance I may be able to keep going indefinitely, depending on what happens over the next few weeks.  Many thanks to everyone who has donated, and if anyone else would like to contribute, the fundraiser page can be found HERE.  Alternatively, direct payments can be made via Paypal – my Paypal email address is:  jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

ShareTweet
qwertyfan

qwertyfan

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • The Cardiff Agreement marks a new chapter in the path to independence
  • The positive case for the Union will be along shortly, this time they mean it.
  • Labour’s lying reply to Believe in Scotland’s petition
  • Burnham’s expected reverse ferret
  • The independence cat is out of the bag

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • September 2026
    • August 2026
    • July 2026
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018

    Categories

    • Comment
    • CommonSpace
    • Craig Murray
    • Lesley Riddoch
    • Phantom Power
    • The National
    • Uncategorized
    • Wee Ginger Dug
    • Yes Bikers

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Aye We Can

    Copyright © 2017 JNews.

    Navigate Site

    • About
    • Home
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Members
    • Password Reset
    • User

    Follow Us

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    No Result
    View All Result
    • About
    • Home
    • Login
    • Logout
    • Members
    • Password Reset
    • User

    Copyright © 2017 JNews.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.